Chicago Board of Education v. Payne

430 N.E.2d 310, 102 Ill. App. 3d 741, 58 Ill. Dec. 368 (1981)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Chicago Board of Education v. Payne

Illinois Appellate Court
430 N.E.2d 310, 102 Ill. App. 3d 741, 58 Ill. Dec. 368 (1981)

  • Written by Mike Begovic, JD

Facts

Artee Payne Jr. (plaintiff) was employed as a tenured teacher in the Chicago Public School District (the district). Payne had been assigned to work with students who demonstrated low respect for authority. After being convicted of marijuana possession, Payne was terminated by the Chicago Board of Education (defendant) (school board) on the ground that his conduct was unbecoming of a teacher. Payne had pleaded guilty to the charge and had received probation. Payne contended that his conviction would not affect his teaching duties, and that the school board failed to give him notice and time to correct his behavior. Payne appealed to the hearing board, which ruled in his favor, citing a lack of evidence demonstrating that his conviction would affect his teaching duties. The circuit court reversed the hearing officer’s decision, and Payne appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Downing, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership