Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. Chicago
United States Supreme Court
166 U.S. 226 (1897)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
The Chicago City Council ordained the widening of a street, requiring the city to condemn various parcels of land. These included right-of-way areas owned by the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company. The city filed a circuit court petition, asking a jury to determine just compensation for private property taken and destroyed in pursuance of the ordinance. The jury fixed the railroad company’s compensation at one dollar. This caused the railroad company to move for a new trial, alleging an infringement of its due-process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The trial court overruled the motion and entered judgement for the City of Chicago.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Harlan, J.)
Dissent (Brewer, J)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.