Chicago Lock Co. v. Fanberg
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
676 F.2d 400 (1982)
Chicago Lock Co. (Chicago Lock) (plaintiff) sold maximum-security tubular locks. Chicago Lock protected information related to all locks and did not provide customers with spare keys. When keys were lost, skilled locksmiths had the ability to pick and decode the tubular locks. These locksmiths often retained the information for later use. Victor Fanberg (defendant) was a locksmith. Fanberg collected tubular lock codes from locksmiths around the country and also decoded tubular locks himself. Fanberg compiled the codes into a manual that made duplicating tubular-lock keys easier and less expensive. Chicago Lock sued Fanberg for trademark infringement and unfair competition. The district court granted summary judgment to Fanberg on the trademark claim, but the unfair-competition claim went to trial. The court found that Chicago Lock’s tubular-lock codes were protectable trade secrets, which Fanberg had obtained through improper means. Fanberg appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Ely, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.