Chicopee Lions Club v. District Attorney for the Hampden District

485 N.E.2d 673 (1985)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Chicopee Lions Club v. District Attorney for the Hampden District

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
485 N.E.2d 673 (1985)

Facts

The Chicopee Lions Club (the club) (plaintiff) was a nonprofit organization that assisted people with sight or hearing impairments. The club planned to hold a “Monte Carlo night” in Chicopee Falls, Massachusetts in March 1983. Monte Carlo nights were popular charity-hosted events where patrons could engage in simulated gambling, with proceeds going to the organizing charity. The club obtained a permit for the Monte Carlo night and spent substantial time and money preparing for the event, including executing a rental agreement for simulated-gambling equipment. On the afternoon of the planned Monte Carlo night, the district attorney for the Hampden District (the DA) (defendant) learned of the event and became upset. The DA called the Chicopee police chief—who was already in attendance at the event along with 800 other local residents—to tell him that the event was illegal. The DA threatened to have police raid the event, confiscate the gambling equipment and proceeds, and arrest attendees. In response to the DA’s threats, the club canceled the Monte Carlo night. The club sued the DA in Massachusetts state court, alleging under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a Massachusetts statute that the DA had violated the club’s constitutional rights to due process, equal protection, and peaceful assembly. The club also asserted that the DA had interfered with the club’s contractual relations, damaged the club’s reputation, and harmed the club’s ability to raise funds at future charitable events. The trial court dismissed the action, finding that the DA was immune from suit. The club appealed directly to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hennessey, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 814,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership