Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank

United States Supreme Court
308 U.S. 371 (1940)


Facts

Chicot County Drainage District (Chicot) (defendant) filed an action in the United States District Court for the Western Division of the Eastern District of Arkansas for modification of its debt as permitted by the Act of May 24, 1934 allowing “Municipal-Debt Readjustments.” The court followed the procedures set out in the statute and readjusted Chicot’s debt. The decree entered in March 1936 created a fund for the payment of old obligations, but required that all such obligations be brought to the court within one year. Baxter State Bank and others (Baxter) (plaintiffs) sued Chicot for preexisting bonds on July 24, 1937. Chicot raised a defense of res judicata based on the earlier decree, and Baxter demurred. At the bench trial, evidence proved that Baxter was given notice of the earlier proceedings but did not appear. The court found for Baxter, and the Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed on the basis of a United States Supreme Court decision declaring unconstitutional the statute under which the readjustment action was decided. Chicot petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari, which was granted.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Hughes, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 128,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 176 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.