Court of Appeals of Maryland
310 A.2d 555 (1973)
The Chirichellas (defendants) entered into a contract to sell their home to the Erwins (plaintiffs). The contract provided that the parties would close the transaction by a specified date. The contract also provided that the specified date would coincide with the Chirichella’s closing date on their new home. The Chirichellas never closed on the new home. The Chirichellas then refused to close on the home with the Erwins because they had not closed on the new home. The Erwins filed suit for specific performance. The trial court found that the disputed term in the contract regarding the new home was not a condition precedent, but merely a term under the contract. The trial court held that the Erwins were entitled to recovery. The Chirichellas appealed to the Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Levine, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.