Chornuk v. Nelson
Supreme Court of North Dakota
857 N.W.2d 587 (2014)
In 1986, Norman and Mildred Dahl conveyed a tract of land to Harry and Linda Chornuk (plaintiffs) by warranty deed. However, the deed was not recorded until 2010. In 2005, after Norman Dahl’s death, Mildred Dahl conveyed the same property by warranty deed to Craig and Julie Nelson (defendants). That deed was recorded in 2005. In 2010, after their deed was recorded, the Chornuks sued the Nelsons to quiet title to the property. The trial court quieted title in favor of the Chornuks. The court found the Chornuks mowed the property, planted trees, installed irrigation lines, and performed other maintenance. The Nelsons testified that they drove past the disputed property daily. The Nelsons argued that they did not know who planted the trees. The Nelsons claimed they only knew that the Chornuks were mowing the grass and watering the trees, and that this knowledge was not sufficient to support a finding that they had notice of the Chornuks’ interest in the property. The court held that the Chornuks’ actions were sufficient to put a prudent person on notice that someone else had an interest in the property. Therefore, according to the court, the Nelsons were required to conduct further inquiry before purchasing the property from Mildred Dahl. The court found the Nelsons had constructive notice of the Chornuks’ interest and were not good-faith purchasers. The Nelsons argued that they acquired their interest in the property in good faith and for valuable consideration. The Nelsons contended that because the Chornuks did not record their deed until after the Nelsons purchased the property and recorded their deed, the Nelsons’ interest was superior to the Chornuks’ interest. The Nelsons appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Crothers, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 687,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 687,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 43,000 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.