Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Chou v. University of Chicago

254 F.3d 1347 (2001)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...

Chou v. University of Chicago

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

254 F.3d 1347 (2001)

Facts

Joany Chou (plaintiff) was a postdoctoral research assistant for Bernard Roizman at the University of Chicago (university) (defendants). Chou alleged that she should have been named as either the sole inventor or a co-inventor on a patent that was owned by the university, through an affiliate, and on which Roizman was named as the sole inventor. The terms of Chou’s academic appointment required Chou to assign all inventions to the university. According to university policy, inventors would receive 25 percent of the gross royalties and up-front payments from the licensing of their patents and 25 percent of the stock of new companies that were based on their inventions. Chou filed suit for correction of inventorship under 35 U.S.C. § 256 against Roizman and the university. Roizman and the university argued that Chou did not have standing to sue under § 256 because she did not have a potential ownership interest in the patent due to her obligation to assign inventions to the university. The district court dismissed the complaint, and Chou appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lourie, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 607,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 34,000 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership