Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Christensen v. Swenson

Supreme Court of Utah
874 P.2d 125 (1994)


Facts

Swenson (defendant) worked as a security guard for Burns (defendant) at the Geneva Steel Plant. During their shifts, guards at the plant were permitted to take unscheduled lunch and restroom breaks lasting 10 to 15 minutes. The only restaurant accessible during these short breaks was the Frontier Cafe, located across the street from the plant and about 150 to 250 yards away from Swenson’s post. A menu for the cafe was displayed at Swenson’s post. On the day of the accident Swenson called the cafe from her post to place an order, then drove to the cafe, intending to return and eat lunch at her post. While returning from the cafe, Swenson collided with Christensen (plaintiff). Christensen sued Swenson and Burns, claiming that Swenson was negligent in her driving. The trial court dismissed Burns on summary judgment after finding that Swenson was not acting within the scope of her employment when the accident occurred. The court of appeals affirmed, holding that Swenson was not within the spatial boundaries of her employment at the time of the accident, because the accident did not occur on employer property.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Durham, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 203,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.