Christian Legal Soc'y v. Walker

453 F.3d 853 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Christian Legal Soc'y v. Walker

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
453 F.3d 853 (2006)

Facts

The Christian Legal Society (CLS) (plaintiff), a national organization composed of Christian lawyers and law students, had a chapter at the Southern Illinois University School of Law (SIU) (defendant). Other student organizations recognized by the law school included the Black Law Student Association, the Women’s Law Forum, and the Hispanic Law Student Association. SIU had an affirmative-action/equal-employment-opportunity policy requiring, among other things, equal educational opportunities for all qualified persons regardless of sexual orientation. SIU’s board of trustees also had a policy prohibiting student organizations that did not comply with federal or state laws concerning nondiscrimination and equal opportunity. CLS permitted anyone to attend meetings, but voting members were not permitted to engage in sexual activity outside of a heterosexual marriage. Anyone who had previously engaged in homosexual conduct must have repented of that conduct. After SIU was notified of CLS’s provisions regarding homosexuality, SIU revoked CLS’s status as a student organization. As a result, CLS no longer had access to the law school’s database of email addresses, could not reserve law-school rooms for meetings, and could not post on law-school bulletin boards, among other things. SIU had not applied its affirmative-action/equal-employment-opportunity policy to any other student organization. CLS filed suit against SIU and SIU officials (collectively, SIU) (defendants), claiming SIU violated its First Amendment rights to free speech, free exercise of religion, and expressive association, as well as its Fourteenth Amendment rights of equal protection and due process. CLS also moved for a preliminary injunction restoring its recognition as a student organization. The trial court denied CLS’s motion for a preliminary injunction, and CLS appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sykes, J.)

Dissent (Wood, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership