Christiansen v. Casey
Missouri Court of Appeals
613 S.W.2d 906 (1981)
Paul Christiansen (plaintiff) owned and developed a 63-lot tract of land. He filed a declaration of restrictions against the lots that included, among other things, a requirement that any fences be chain-link. The declaration gave Christiansen the power to review and approve any construction on the lots, including fences. The document at various times referred to Christiansen as “owner,” “developer,” and “the undersigned.” Casey (defendant) owned one of the lots and was aware of the restrictive covenants. Richard Casey built a wooden fence without Christiansen’s approval. Christiansen brought suit seeking to enforce the restrictive covenant against Casey. At the time he filed suit, Christiansen no longer owned any of the 63 lots. Christiansen did, however, own property in an adjacent neighborhood. The trial court dismissed Christiansen’s complaint for lack of standing. Christiansen appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Nugent, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 723,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 723,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.