Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
C

Christie v. Seybold

55 Fed. 69 (1893)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Christie v. Seybold

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
55 Fed. 69 (1893)

Facts

Charles Seybold (defendant) devised an idea for a new type of bookbinder’s press in October 1885. However, due to a claimed lack of tools and an unwillingness to perfect the invention in a shop owned by another person, Seybold did not reduce the machine to practical form until April 1889. Seybold filed his patent application on June 6, 1889. W. H. Christie (plaintiff) conceived of the same type of machine in the summer of 1886, reduced it to practice in 1888, and filed his patent application on June 7, 1889. The United States Patent and Trademark Office conducted an interference hearing in which it was determined that Christie was the true inventor. Seybold initiated proceedings in federal district court. The court held that Seybold was the true inventor. Christie appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Taft, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Patent

Key Terms