United States Supreme Court
55 U.S. (14 How.) 282 (1852)
Christy (plaintiff) was in possession of a tract of land. After the United States acquired the land from Mexico, Scott (defendant) forcibly removed Christy from the land. Christy brought suit against Scott, claiming that Christy held title to the land, and that Scott illegally forcibly ejected him from the premises. Scott did not submit evidence that he held legal title to the property, but rather submitted the substantive defense that if Christy held any title to the property, then it was no longer valid. Specifically, Scott submitted evidence that the State of Texas held true legal title to the property. Scott was not associated with the State of Texas. Christy demurred to Scott’s substantive defense. The district court ruled in favor of Scott. Christy appealed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Curtis, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.