Chrysler Corporation v. Commissioner

436 F.3d 644 (2006)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Chrysler Corporation v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
436 F.3d 644 (2006)



Chrysler Corporation (Chrysler) (plaintiff) filed suit due to an issue with its accrual-accounting-method tax returns. Chrysler included deductions of over $567 million and $297 million on its 1984 and 1985 federal income taxes, respectively, on the basis that Chrysler incurred those amounts as warranty expenses on automobiles sold to its dealers in those years. The sales occurred when the vehicle was delivered to the carrier for shipment to the dealer. No question arose that the initial events were all completed in the taxable years concerned. However, with a new vehicle warranty, which is generally mandated by relevant state and federal laws, the actual warranty claims and expenses had not been incurred. Chrysler used a consultant who provided the best possible information to estimate future claims and costs. However, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) (defendant) argued that Chrysler could not deduct those amounts, as the warranty claims had not yet been made. Under the all-events test, the events must have occurred, establishing the fact of liability, and the amount of liability must be determinable with reasonable accuracy. Unfortunately, two contradictory Supreme Court cases contemplating these matters occurred. In the first, Hughes Properties, a casino required by state law to pay a percentage of the funds gambled as a jackpot, was allowed to claim the casino’s deductions because the last play of the year was the final event creating liability, thus satisfying the test. In the second case, General Dynamics, a company wrote off costs of its employee medical plan, but whereas the needs had arisen and treatment was obtained, the employees had not yet filed the reimbursement form. Therefore, the Court denied the company the deduction because the reimbursement forms had to be filed to fulfill the events establishing the fact of liability. The trial court ruled for the commissioner in this case, and Chrysler appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Norris, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 736,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 736,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 736,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership