Chrysler Credit Corporation v. Koontz
Illinois Appellate Court
661 N.E.2d 1171, 277 III. App. 3d 1078, 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d 1 (1996)

- Written by Katrina Sumner, JD
Facts
While Chrysler Credit Corporation (Chrysler) (plaintiff) was in the process of repossessing James Koontz’s (defendant) vehicle, Koontz ran out yelling for Chrysler not to take the car. Chrysler continued with the repossession. Koontz filed suit. At trial, Koontz testified about yelling at Chrysler not to take his car. However, Koontz acknowledged that the repossessor did not speak to him. Koontz stated that he could have gotten into a fight with the repossessor, but he chose not to fight because he was wearing only underwear. The record indicated that Koontz did not argue forcefully, act in a threatening manner, or brandish any weapons, which might have suggested to the repossessor that violence was likely to occur if the repossession continued. The trial court ruled in favor of Chrysler. Koontz appealed, asking the appellate court to rule that an oral protest from the debtor alone is sufficient to constitute a breach of the peace.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Maag, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.