Church by Mail, Inc. v. Commissioner

765 F.2d 1387 (1985)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Church by Mail, Inc. v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
765 F.2d 1387 (1985)

Facts

In 1978, Church by Mail, Inc. (the church) (plaintiff) was organized by Reverends James Ewing and M.R. McElrath (the ministers). The church’s main focus was sending printed materials, including sermons, to its mailing list of over 3 million recipients. The church regularly requested money in its mailings and received over $3 million in donations in 1980. Twentieth Century Advertising Agency (Twentieth), a for-profit company also owned and controlled by the ministers, provided printing and mailing services for the church. Pursuant to two contracts between the church and Twentieth, signed by Reverend Ewing on behalf of both entities, Twentieth charged the church at cost plus 15 percent commission. Between April 1980 and February 1981, the church paid Twentieth over $180,000 under this arrangement and received significant advances that it partially repaid with minimal interest. Twentieth spent approximately two-thirds of its time on work for the church and refused to disclose its other clients. Twentieth did not advertise its services. From 1979 through 1981, Reverend Ewing received over $97,000 in compensation from the church and over $210,000 from Twentieth, and Reverend McElrath received $93,000 from the church and over $208,000 from Twentieth. In 1980, the church filed an application with the commissioner of internal revenue (defendant) to obtain tax-exempt status under Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3). The commissioner denied the application, and the tax court agreed, finding that the church functioned for the nonexempt purpose of providing a market for Twentieth’s business and that its earnings went principally to the private benefit of the ministers. The church appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Alarcon, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership