Church of Scientology of California v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
823 F.2d 1310 (1987)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Church of Scientology (the church) (plaintiff) was a nonprofit organization founded by L. Ron Hubbard. Hubbard and his wife had sole control over the church’s key bank accounts, and Hubbard was the trustee of the church’s trust into which the church put substantial funds. Hubbard was also the sole signatory on all church financial planning. Over one million dollars were withdrawn from the trust and kept on a yacht that Hubbard and his wife used as a residence. Similarly, the church made millions of dollars of payments to OTC, an independent, private organization controlled by key figures in the church, and ultimately sent that money to the yacht. In addition, church policy required any church literature produced to be copyrighted in Hubbard’s name, regardless of whether he wrote it. Hubbard was paid a 10 percent royalty on all such literature. Finally, the church required all Scientology organizations around the world to pay Hubbard 10 percent of their income as “debt repayments” to repay Hubbard for his efforts establishing the church. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) revoked the church’s tax-exempt status, finding that part of the church’s revenues inured to the benefit of Hubbard and his family as opposed to a public interest. The IRS also assessed tax deficiencies due to the revocation. The church appealed the revocation in the United States Tax Court. The tax court upheld the IRS’s determination. The church appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tang, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.