Church v. Hubbart
United States Supreme Court
6 U.S. 187, 2 L. Ed. 249 (1804)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Church (plaintiff) owned the American cargo vessel Aurora. Church entered into an insuring agreement with Hubbart (defendant) for the protection of the cargo aboard. The agreement specifically included a clause stating that the “insurers are not liable for seizure by the Portuguese for illicit trade.” The Aurora subsequently set sail for Brazil. The Portuguese seized the ship four leagues off Brazil’s coast, outside Portugal’s territorial jurisdiction. Church sought payment for the cargo lost in the seizure, and Hubbart denied the claim, citing the clause. Church filed suit against Hubbart, claiming that the act by the Portuguese was not a seizure for illicit trade. The lower courts found for Hubbart. Church appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.