From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Churchill Downs, Inc. v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
307 F.3d 423 (2002)
Churchill Downs, Inc. (CDI) (plaintiff) owned and operated four race tracks. CDI earned revenue from track admissions, concessions, betting, licensing rights, and broadcasting rights. To compete with other sports, entertainment, and gaming operators, CDI paid for invited dignitaries and journalists to attend events before major CDI races like the Kentucky Derby, such as receptions, parties, breakfasts, and dinners. CDI’s events were not open to race-track patrons or the general public, and tickets were not sold at the events. CDI did not expect event guests to attend the races, but CDI hoped that the guests would help CDI promote the races. CDI considered the money spent on its events to be akin to the money that a designer spends on fashion shows to promote the designer’s clothes. CDI deducted the full amount paid for its events as tax-deductible business expenses under § 162(a) of the federal tax code. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) determined that, while CDI’s event expenses were business expenditures, the expenses were paying for entertainment activities. Under § 274(n)(1) of the tax code, as interpreted by its implementing regulation, 26 C.F.R. 1.274-2(b)(1)(ii), expenses for entertainment activities were entitled to a business-expense deduction of no more than the total amount spent on those activities. The commissioner ruled that CDI could deduct only 50 percent of its expenditures on entertainment, amusement, or recreational activities. CDI petitioned the tax court for a redetermination. The tax court ruled for the commissioner, and CDI appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Siler, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.