Cicippio-Puleo v. Islamic Republic of Iran
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
353 F.3d 1024 (2004)
Facts
The Federal Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) gave foreign sovereigns general immunity from suit in the United States. As part of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), Congress passed the terrorism exception, 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(7). The terrorism exception waived the immunity of a foreign state or its agents for certain acts of terrorism in specific circumstances. The terrorism exception did not explicitly create a cause of action and did not impose any liabilities for damages. Congress later passed the Flatow Amendment, 28 U.S.C. § 1605 note. The Flatow Amendment created a private right of action against officials, agents, or employees of a foreign state for the acts identified in the terrorism exception, and it imposed liability on those individuals. Joseph Cicippio was taken hostage for several years by the Hezbollah, an Islamic terrorist group that was materially supported by the Republic of Iran (Iran) (defendant). A group of Cicippio’s children and siblings (the Cicippio relatives) (plaintiffs) sued Iran in federal court for intentional infliction of emotional distress and also sought solatium damages. Iran failed to respond, and the Cicippio relatives filed a motion for summary judgment. The district court found that, pursuant to the FSIA, there was no federal subject-matter jurisdiction over the case. The Cicippio relatives appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Edwards, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 707,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.