Cigarrilha v. City of Providence
Rhode Island Supreme Court
64 A.3d 1208 (2013)
- Written by Tanya Munson, JD
Facts
Cecilia and Manuel Cigarrilha (plaintiffs) owned a three-family rental unit on property in Providence, Rhode Island. The unit on the property was constructed in 1911, and in 1923 the City of Providence (defendant) adopted its first zoning ordinance. The ordinance designated the area where the Cigarrilhas’ property was located as a low-density residential zone and only permitted single-family or two-family dwellings. According to the ordinance, any uses established before the ordinance’s 1923 enactment were deemed to be grandfathered in. In 2008, the Cigarrilhas requested permits from the city to restore electrical meters at the property. The city conducted an inspection of the property before issuing the permits and determined that the unit on the property was being used as a three-family dwelling in violation of the city’s zoning ordinance. The Cigarrilhas filed a complaint and motion for a temporary restraining order in superior court. The Cigarrilhas sought to enjoin the city from enforcing the ordinance codes. The Cigarrilhas also filed an appeal of the city’s determination that their property was an illegal three-family dwelling with the city’s zoning board of appeals. The zoning board affirmed the city’s determination. The Cigarrilhas amended their superior-court complaint to appeal the zoning board’s decision and to seek a declaration that their property was a legal nonconforming use. The trial judge found that the Cigarrilhas did not prove that their property was used as a three-family dwelling before the 1923 zoning ordinance and declined to declare the property constituted a legal nonconforming use. The Cigarrilhas appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Robinson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.