Cinderella Career and Finishing Schools, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
425 F.2d 583 (1970)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (plaintiff) filed a complaint against Cinderella Career and Finishing Schools, Inc. (Cinderella) (defendant), charging Cinderella with 13 counts of unfair and deceptive advertising and marketing practices. An FTC hearing examiner conducted a 16-day hearing that involved 52 witnesses and 247 exhibits. The hearing examiner then issued a 93-page ruling, holding that the charges should be dismissed. FTC counsel appealed the hearing examiner’s ruling to the FTC’s five commissioners, including chairman Paul Rand Dixon (the commissioners). While the appeal was pending, Dixon gave a speech to a newspaper association in which he suggested that businesses like Cinderella were obviously deceptive and newspapers should therefore refuse to publish their advertisements. When deciding the case, the commissioners criticized the hearing examiner’s assessments and then opted to evaluate the challenged advertisements de novo and without considering the witness testimony. The commissioners ultimately reversed the hearing officer on six of the 13 counts and issued a cease-and-desist order. Cinderella appealed to the District of Columbia Circuit, arguing that the commissioners violated due process by reviewing the advertisements de novo and that Dixon should have been disqualified from participating in the appeal because his statement to the newspaper association evinced prejudgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tamm, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.