Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Cine Forty-Second Street Theatre Corp. v. Allied Artists Pictures Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
602 F.2d 1062 (2d Cir. 1979)


Facts

Cine Forty-Second Street Theatre Corp. (Cine) (plaintiff) brought an antitrust suit against Allied Artists Pictures Corp. and others (defendants), claiming $3 million in treble damages. In November 1975, the defendants served a first set of consolidated interrogatories on Cine. Cine responded to these interrogatories four months late and the responses were severely inadequate. Cine then failed to obey two subsequent orders from a magistrate compelling discovery. The magistrate found the disobedience to be willful. Subsequently, in the summer of 1977, Cine filed another round of answers, one of which was over two months late, and both of which were inadequate. The responses did not include a method of calculating the main portion of the alleged damages, something that Cine had not yet produced despite repeated requests by the defendants and the magistrate. In September 1978, the defendants moved for dismissal of Cine’s complaint on account of its continued failure to obey the magistrate’s order requiring a response on calculation of damages. The magistrate again concluded that Cine’s disobedience was willful and recommended to the district court that Cine be precluded from introducing evidence on damages moving forward (thus effectively dismissing Cine’s claim for damages). The district court held that it was impossible to confirm that Cine’s disobedience was willful versus grossly negligent. The district court then certified an interlocutory appeal.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Kaufman, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.