From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...
Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
505 U.S. 504 (1992)
Rose Cipollone started smoking in 1942 and died of lung cancer in 1984. In 1965, Congress passed a law requiring cigarette manufacturers to place a warning on cigarette packages. In a section titled Preemption, the law stated that, other than the federal warning requirement, “[n]o statement relating to smoking and health” could be required on packages or in the advertising of cigarettes. The preemption provision was broadened in 1969 to state, “No requirement or prohibition based on smoking and health shall be imposed under State law with respect to the advertising or promotion of [properly labeled cigarettes].” Cipollone and her husband (plaintiffs) brought suit in federal district court against Liggett Group, Inc. and other cigarette manufacturers (defendants) for failure to warn, among other claims. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the claims were preempted by the federal law. The trial court held that the claims were not preempted. The court of appeals held that some claims were preempted and remanded the case. On remand, the trial court held that all claims arising after the 1965 act were preempted. After a trial, the jury found the defendants liable on some claims preceding the 1965 act, but declined to award Cipollone's estate damages because of her own responsibility for her injuries. Cipollone's husband was awarded damages. After Cipollone's husband died, the Cipollones' son was substituted as plaintiff on behalf of their estates. Both parties appealed to the court of appeals, which affirmed the trial court's preemption decision. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on the preemption issue.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Scalia, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.