Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Rosemary Walker DeCristoforo
Massachusetts Superior Court
28 Mass. L. Rptr. 139 (2011)
- Written by Sheri Dennis, JD
Facts
Rosemary DeCristoforo (defendant) opened two credit-card accounts with Citibank South Dakota, N.A. (Citibank) (plaintiff). DeCristoforo used the credit cards to purchase goods and services and to obtain cash advances. Citibank periodically sent billing statements to DeCristoforo. However, DeCristoforo failed to pay the amounts due on either account. Citibank sent DeCristoforo monthly statements advising her that she was being charged interest on all unpaid amounts she owed. The annual interest rate charged by Citibank for these overdue amounts were allowed under South Dakota law and ranged from 10.65 percent to over 50 percent. Subsequently, Citibank filed an action against DeCristoforo to recover the amounts she owed. DeCristoforo filed a counterclaim, alleging that Citibank had violated federal law by charging her interest in an amount greater than 7 percent, which was in violation of 12 U.S.C. § 85 (Section 85). DeCristoforo moved for partial summary judgment, and Citibank cross-moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cornetta, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.