From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
CitiFinancial, Inc. v. Brown
United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi
2001 WL 1530352 (2001)
In December 1998, John Brown (defendant), a severely mentally disabled man, and his mother, Catherine Brown (defendant), took out a debt consolidation loan with CitiFinancial, Inc. (Citi) (plaintiff). The loan contained an arbitration clause requiring the Browns to submit any claims they might have against Citi to arbitration. Citi required both John and Catherine to sign the loan agreement. Despite the arbitration clause in the agreement, John Brown filed a civil action against Citi in Mississippi state court. His mother, Catherine, was not a party to this suit. Citi then filed a petition to compel arbitration in federal district court and to stay John Brown’s civil action in state court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Davidson, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.