Citizens for a Better Environment v. Environmental Protection Agency

596 F.2d 720 (1979)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Citizens for a Better Environment v. Environmental Protection Agency

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
596 F.2d 720 (1979)

Facts

Section 101(e) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) stated that the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (defendant) should establish regulations specifying minimum requirements for public participation in environmental enforcement. The legislative history for the 1972 amendments to the FWPCA stated that the EPA’s administrator was directed to encourage public participation. The sponsor of the amendments stated that provisions encouraging public participation were to be applied across the entire statute, including in establishing permit programs. In 1977, the EPA approved Illinois’s application to administer a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit system. Citizens for a Better Environment (CBE) (plaintiff), an environmental group, challenged the approval, arguing that it violated the FWPCA. The EPA had not set out guidelines for public participation in state permit systems. Illinois’s program allowed citizens to file suits with the Illinois Pollution Control Board and to intervene in state enforcement actions. However, CBE argued that the adequacy of these measures could not be assessed because of the lack of guidance from the EPA. The EPA argued that the provisions of the FWPCA concerning public participation in enforcement were very general and did not specifically require the EPA to issue guidelines about public participation. The EPA also argued that the Illinois program provided sufficient provision for public participation for approval without the issuance of guidelines.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Swygert, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership