Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Office of Administration
United State Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
566 F.3d 219 (2009)
- Written by Kathryn Lohmeyer, JD
Facts
The Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP) lost track of millions of White House e-mails. The Office of Administration (OA) (defendant) was a unit within the EOP. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) (plaintiff) submitted a request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, seeking OA records related to the missing e-mails. Despite initially agreeing to provide the requested information, OA later refused to produce the majority of its potentially responsive records. OA asserted that it was not an agency subject to FOIA, because OA’s sole function was to provide administrative support to the president and EOP staff. CREW filed a complaint against OA in federal district court. OA moved to dismiss the complaint. The district court granted OA’s motion, holding that OA was not an agency subject to FOIA’s disclosure requirements. CREW appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Griffith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.