Citizens in Charge v. Gale

810 F. Supp. 2d 916 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Citizens in Charge v. Gale

United States District Court for the District of Nebraska
810 F. Supp. 2d 916 (2011)

JC

Facts

Nebraska allowed ballot initiatives but mandated that each ballot-initiative petition circulated by a paid circulator had to state, in red ink and 16-point type, that the petition was circulated by a paid circulator. Citizens in Charge (plaintiff), a nonprofit group dedicated to supporting and expanding ballot initiatives and referendums across many states, filed suit against Nebraska Secretary of State John Gale (defendant), terming the required disclosure to be offensive, coerced speech. Ultimately, Citizens in Charge alleged that the required disclosure violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and that the disclosures had no rational relationship to a legitimate state interest. The state argued that the reasons for the disclosure were two-fold—first, to help signers determine whether they wished to sign and second, to deter circulation fraud. Citizens in Charge argued that neither of these theories met the rational-basis test. Of the 42 petition drives since the disclosure had become law, 34 of the drives were successful in their end result of placing particular issues, candidates, or parties on the relevant ballot.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Batallion, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership