Citizens to End Animal Suffering and Exploitation v. New England Aquarium
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
836 F. Supp. 45 (1993)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Kama (plaintiff) was a dolphin born into captivity. The New England Aquarium (the aquarium) (defendant) purchased Kama with the intention to breed him and display him in shows. However, Kama did not cooperate or fit in with the other dolphins. Thus, the aquarium requested that the Department of the Navy (the Navy) (defendant) purchase Kama. The Navy agreed and transferred Kama to Hawaii, where he was studied for his sonar capabilities. Multiple animal-rights organizations (the organizations) (plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit with Kama named as a plaintiff. The complaint alleged that the transfer violated federal law because the taking of a marine mammal occurred without the grant of a permit by the government. The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that Kama, as an animal, lacked standing to bring the lawsuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wolf, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.