City of Atlanta v. McKinney
Georgia Supreme Court
454 S.E.2d 517 (1995)

- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
The city of Atlanta (the city) (defendant) enacted an ordinance that established a domestic-partnership registry for jail visitation (the registry ordinance). Those who filed a declaration of domestic partnership were permitted to visit their partners in city jails. The city passed another ordinance (the benefits ordinance) that extended health insurance and other benefits to domestic partners of city employees. The benefits ordinance defined domestic partnership as a family relationship. State representative Billy McKinney (plaintiff) filed suit, seeking to have the ordinances declared invalid. The trial court found that the ordinances were both invalid. The city appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Carley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.