City of Chicago v. Barr
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
961 F.3d 882 (2020)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Byrne Justice Assistance Grants (JAG grants) provided federal funding to support state and local law enforcement. The annual grants were determined using a formula under which the award amounts to each state and local government were interdependent. For JAG grants in 2017, the attorney general attached certain conditions to the receipt of funding. Specifically, a state or local government was required to (1) notify federal immigration authorities when noncitizens were released from custody, (2) give federal agents access to noncitizens while in custody, and (3) comply with a federal law prohibiting local governments from stopping their officials from communicating immigration information to federal authorities. For 2018 grants, the receipt of funding was subject to similar conditions. The 2017 and 2018 conditions conflicted with an ordinance of the City of Chicago (Chicago) (plaintiff), prompting Chicago to sue Attorney General William Barr (defendant) to challenge their imposition. The district court concluded that the conditions were facially unlawful and issued an injunction prohibiting the conditions’ imposition as to all applicants for JAG grants. Barr appealed, arguing, among other things, that the district court erred in granting a universal injunction that extended relief beyond Chicago, the specific complainant in the suit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rovner, J.)
Concurrence (Manion, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.