City of Chicago v. Wallace Wilson and Kim Kimberley

389 N.E.2d 522, 75 Ill. 2d 525, 27 Ill. Dec. 458 (1978)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

City of Chicago v. Wallace Wilson and Kim Kimberley

Illinois Supreme Court
389 N.E.2d 522, 75 Ill. 2d 525, 27 Ill. Dec. 458 (1978)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In 1974 law-enforcement officers arrested Wallace Wilson and Kim Kimberley (defendants) for violating a municipal ordinance that made it a misdemeanor for an individual to appear in public wearing clothes not in conformity with the individual’s sex. Wilson and Kimberley were charged with misdemeanors. In response, Wilson and Kimberley appealed on the ground that the ordinance was an unconstitutional infringement on their liberty interests. Wilson and Kimberley argued that they were undergoing psychiatric therapy in preparation for sex-reassignment operations and were instructed to practice appearing in public as females prior to the surgery. The city of Chicago (plaintiff) (the city) claimed that the ordinance was designed to protect citizens from being misled by someone’s sex and to prevent antisocial conduct that violated societal norms. However, the city failed to address how cross-dressing in preparation for sex-reassignment surgery was harmful to society. The Illinois Supreme Court reviewed the case.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moran, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership