From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...
City of Cuyahoga Falls v. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation
United States Supreme Court
538 U.S. 188 (2003)
The City of Cuyahoga Falls (Cuyahoga) (defendant) called for a referendum on a petition for the repeal of a site-plan ordinance for low-income housing. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation (Buckeye) and other organizations (plaintiffs) with plans for low-income housing that had been approved by the ordinance sued for racial discrimination in federal district court under the Due Process Clause, the Equal Protection Clause, and the Fair Housing Act (FHA), 42 U.S.C. § 3601. In a related state proceeding, the Supreme Court of Ohio found that Cuyahoga’s use of the referendum violated the Ohio constitution. Consequently, the referendum never went into effect. However, the plaintiffs’ claims remained, challenging Cuyahoga’s submission of the petition to referendum and refusal to issue building permits while the petition was pending. Specifically, the plaintiffs argued that the submission of the petition to referendum (1) violated the right to equal protection, because the petition was racially motivated and disproportionately affected racial minorities, and (2) violated substantive due process, because the submission of an administrative land-use determination to a referendum procedure was per se arbitrary. The plaintiffs further argued that the refusal to issue building permits while the petition was pending was similarly discriminatory and arbitrary. The district court granted summary judgment for Cuyahoga, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed, finding genuine issues of material fact. Cuyahoga petitioned to the United States Supreme Court for certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.