City of Fort Collins v. Colorado Oil
Colorado Supreme Court
369 P.3d 586 (2016)
- Written by Tanya Munson, JD
Facts
Colorado’s interest in oil and gas development was expressed in the Oil and Gas Conservation Act (OGCA), and the rules and regulations were promulgated thereunder by the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (the commission), the state agency that administered the OGCA’s provisions. According to the OGCA, the commission was empowered to make and enforce rules, regulations, and orders, and to regulate oil or gas production operations. The commission had promulgated rules and regulations that comprehensively regulated the fracking process. In 2013, the citizens of the City of Fort Collins (the city) voted in favor of an ordinance that placed a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing and the storage of its waste products in the city for five years (the moratorium). The city subsequently amended its municipal code to prohibit hydraulic fracturing and storage of associated materials within the city. The Colorado Oil and Gas Associations (the association) (plaintiff) sued the city and requested a declaratory judgment declaring that the OGCA preempts the fracking moratorium and a permanent injunction enjoining the enforcement of the moratorium. The district court concluded that the OGCA impliedly preempted the city’s authority to regulate fracking and therefore preempted the moratorium.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gabriel, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.