From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
City of Kennewick v. Day
Washington Supreme Court
11 P.3d 304 (2000)
Doug Day (defendant) was arrested on suspicion of driving while intoxicated. The arresting officer searched Day’s truck and found a marijuana pipe and some marijuana in an armrest. Day immediately denied any knowledge of the drug materials and said that he had just picked up his truck from a repair shop. A blood-alcohol test showed that Day had not been intoxicated. However, Day was charged with possessing drug paraphernalia that he either had used or intended to use. At trial, Day presented evidence that (1) an auto-repair shop had worked on his truck for four months right before the arrest, (2) a shop employee that had worked on Day’s truck had been fired for suspected drug usage, and (3) a previous shop customer had complained about finding drug paraphernalia in the customer’s car after having it at the shop. Day attempted to introduce additional evidence that he had a reputation for not doing drugs in order to show that it was unlikely that he had used or intended to use the marijuana pipe. The trial court excluded the evidence as inadmissible evidence of past conduct. Day was convicted of possessing drug paraphernalia with intent to use it. Day appealed, arguing that the trial court should have allowed evidence of his reputation for sobriety. The superior court reversed the conviction, but the appellate court reinstated it. Day appealed to the Washington Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Madsen, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.