Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

City of Ladue v. Horn

Court of Appeals of Missouri
720 S.W.2d 745 (Mo. App. 1986)


Facts

The City of Ladue, Missouri (the city) (plaintiff), enacted a zoning ordinance that prohibited non-family members from jointly occupying a home. The term “family” was defined as one or more individuals related by blood, marriage, or adoption. The purpose of the ordinance was to promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the city. The city filed suit against Joan Horn and E. Terrence Jones (defendants), alleging that Horn and Jones violated the ordinance by cohabitating in a seven-bedroom house. The defendants had purchased the house together, and Horn’s two children resided along with Jones’s child in the house. Although the defendants were not legally married, Horn and Jones shared a common bedroom, maintained a joint checking account, ate meals together, and disciplined each other’s children. Horn and Jones filed a counterclaim against the city, alleging that the zoning ordinance was unconstitutional. The trial court entered a permanent injunction in favor of the city. Horn and Jones appealed. The enforcement of the injunction was stayed pending the appeal.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Crandall, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 223,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.