City of Laredo v. Villarreal

81 S.W.3d 865 (2002)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

City of Laredo v. Villarreal

Texas Court of Appeals
81 S.W.3d 865 (2002)

RW

Facts

The city of Laredo (city) (defendant) informed the Villarreals (plaintiffs) that the communications tower on their property constituted a nonconforming use under the city zoning code. The Villarreals obtained a nontransferable conditional-use permit (CUP), which allowed them to continue the nonconforming use if they brought the tower within the CUP’s specified conditions. The Villarreals found that they could not comply with all of the CUP’s conditions, so they decided to replace their tower with a second structure that would be CUP-compliant. The city told the Villarreals that their CUP was intended only to bring the current tower into code compliance and could not be transferred to the replacement tower. The Villarreals sued for a contrary declaratory judgment, arguing that the nontransferability clause barred only transfers from the Villarreals’ property to someone else’s property, not from one tower on their property to another on the same property. Although both parties could point to language in the CUP that arguably supported their respective positions, the trial court ruled for the Villarreals. The city appealed to the Texas Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Angelini, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership