City of Laredo v. Villarreal
Texas Court of Appeals
81 S.W.3d 865 (2002)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The city of Laredo (city) (defendant) informed the Villarreals (plaintiffs) that the communications tower on their property constituted a nonconforming use under the city zoning code. The Villarreals obtained a nontransferable conditional-use permit (CUP), which allowed them to continue the nonconforming use if they brought the tower within the CUP’s specified conditions. The Villarreals found that they could not comply with all of the CUP’s conditions, so they decided to replace their tower with a second structure that would be CUP-compliant. The city told the Villarreals that their CUP was intended only to bring the current tower into code compliance and could not be transferred to the replacement tower. The Villarreals sued for a contrary declaratory judgment, arguing that the nontransferability clause barred only transfers from the Villarreals’ property to someone else’s property, not from one tower on their property to another on the same property. Although both parties could point to language in the CUP that arguably supported their respective positions, the trial court ruled for the Villarreals. The city appealed to the Texas Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Angelini, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.