United States Supreme Court
__ U.S. __, 135 S. Ct. __ (2015)
Naranjibhai Patel and other motel operators in Los Angeles (plaintiffs) filed a federal suit against the City of Los Angeles (City) (defendant), alleging that Los Angeles Municipal Code § 41.49 permitted unreasonable searches and seizures in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Section 41.49 required hotel or motel operators to keep certain records regarding all guests and to make the records available for inspection by any City police officer upon demand. Failure to comply with the ordinance constituted a misdemeanor criminal offense punishable by up to six months in jail and a $1,000 fine. The district court found for the City. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed, holding that the ordinance was facially unconstitutional. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sotomayor, J.)
Dissent (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.