City of Marshall v. City of Uncertain

206 S.W.3d 97 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

City of Marshall v. City of Uncertain

Texas Supreme Court
206 S.W.3d 97 (2006)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

In 1986, the Texas Water Development Board certified that the City of Marshall, Texas (plaintiff) had adjudicated water rights to potable water for municipal purposes. The adjudication process had not weighed the environmental impacts of Marshall’s historic water use. In 2001, Marshall applied to change its use so it could supply untreated water for industrial use. The City of Uncertain, Texas, and others (defendants) objected on the ground that the change would have serious environmental and socioeconomic consequences and requested a contested-case hearing. The Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission (now the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality) (TCEQ) denied a hearing and granted Marshall’s application. Uncertain appealed. The district court reversed and granted Uncertain’s motion for a hearing. Marshall appealed, and the appellate court partially affirmed and partially reversed. The TCEQ and Marshall petitioned the Texas Supreme Court for review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (O’Neill, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership