From our private database of 22,600+ case briefs...
City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
768 N.W.2d 749 (2009)
The Veterans of Foreign Wars (Veterans) (plaintiff) owned property in Milwaukee. In 1961, Veterans entered a leaseback agreement with Towne Metropolitan, under which Veterans sold the property in exchange for a 99-year lease requiring an annual rent of $1. The lease did not contain a clause requiring the lessor to ensure that the building would have sufficient value to compensate Veterans for the lease’s value in the event of condemnation. Towne Metropolitan built a hotel on the property and later sold the property to Marquette University. Marquette sold the property to Maharishi Vedic University. By the 1990s, the hotel and surrounding neighborhood had deteriorated. In 2001, the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee (agency) (defendant) made an offer of $440,000 to condemn the property. Veterans was the only occupant. The circuit court awarded $300,000 to Veterans and $140,000 to Maharishi for the taking. Veterans appealed. The circuit court applied the unit rule, under which property value is based on one unit rather than separate property interests. The jury found that the property had no market value, because the cost of razing or renovating the hotel exceeded the cost of the land in its undeveloped state. The circuit court ordered Veterans to return the award. Veterans appealed, claiming that its lease had value independent of the property’s value. The court of appeals reversed the judgment and adopted a fairness-award doctrine, under which the condemnor must pay more than the property’s value if the condemnation value is insufficient to pay the lessee. Veterans brought a separate action against the three lessors, claiming that they had breached a lease clause requiring them to maintain the building in good condition. The court found that the clause did not exist.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Abrahamson, C.J.)
Concurrence (Ziegler, J.)
Dissent (Prosser, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.