City of New Orleans v. Clark

251 So. 3d 1047 (2018)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

City of New Orleans v. Clark

Louisiana Supreme Court
251 So. 3d 1047 (2018)

Facts

Lawrence Clark (defendant) was cited for displaying his art for sale in violation of a municipal ordinance that prohibited retail sales outside any enclosed building in New Orleans unless expressly permitted by another section of the municipal code. Other sections of the code created a permitting process that allowed artists to sell their work in certain specified areas. The cumulative effect of the ordinance was to create a blanket prohibition on the outdoor sale of art in New Orleans except in two narrowly defined spaces in the French Quarter. Clark argued this violated his fundamental right to free speech guaranteed by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The City of New Orleans (the city) (plaintiff) conceded that Clark’s right to free speech or expression was implicated. Nevertheless, the city argued the ordinance was a valid time, place, and manner restriction that served a public-safety interest. The trial court denied Clark’s motion to quash the citation, and the appellate court affirmed. Clark appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Clark, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership