From our private database of 32,100+ case briefs...
City of New York v. New York Yankees
New York Supreme Court
458 N.Y.S.2d 486 (1983)
The New York Yankees (defendant) leased the use of the team’s home baseball stadium (Yankee Stadium) from the City of New York (plaintiff). Under the lease, the Yankees were required to play all their home games at Yankee Stadium. The city had made extensive renovations to the stadium, but there were still certain structural flaws. With the Yankees’ approval, the city was scheduled to make permanent repairs between the close of the 1982 season and opening of the 1983 season. In the summer and fall of 1982, the city kept the Yankees apprised of construction status. There was a slight chance the city would not be done with construction by the start of the opening home series between the Yankees and the Detroit Tigers, scheduled for April 11, 12, and 13 at Yankee Stadium. In October 1982, the Yankees asked for a “guarantee” that the stadium work would be timely completed. The city was agreeable. The Yankees then added that the guarantee must include an assurance that there would be no debris in sight of fans and that every seat would be available. The city responded that it would use its best efforts and “in the worst case, only 1000 to 2000 seats would be unavailable.” About three weeks later in November 1982, the Yankees informed the city that the team would be playing its opening home series with Detroit at the Denver Mile High Stadium and would start the Yankees’ home schedule in New York on April 15. New York promptly sued the Yankees seeking a preliminary injunction to stop the execution of any agreement with Denver pending trial. The Yankees opposed the requested injunction on various equitable grounds.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lane, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 583,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 583,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.