Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

City of Palm Springs v. Living Desert Reserve

California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 2
82 Cal. Rptr. 2d 859 (Ct. App.), review denied (1999)


Facts

In 1986, a will was executed conveying 30 acres of land to the City of Palm Springs (plaintiff) on the express condition that it be forever used as “a public park for the exposition of desert fauna and flora.” The deed provided that if this condition were breached, the land would pass to the Living Desert Reserve (defendant) and the City would forfeit all rights to it. In 1989, the City determined it would rather use the land for a golf course, and attempted to purchase Living Desert’s reversionary interest. These negotiations failed. In March 1993 the City filed a complaint in eminent domain to gain possession of the land, and applied for immediate possession of the reversionary interest. The trial court granted immediate possession. In October 1993, Living Desert cross-complained against the City, alleging that the condition had been breached and the City’s interest in the land had reverted to Living Desert. The trial court held that Living Desert’s reversionary interest was not compensable. Living Desert appealed, and the state Attorney General joined as amicus curiae. Living Desert argued that the normal rules governing compensation of reversionary interests do not apply when a condemnor uses eminent domain to avoid complying with conditions attached to a gift of property. The Attorney General argued that the land was given to the city in trust, not in fee simple subject to a condition subsequent.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (McKinster, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 204,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.