City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.

110 P.2d 983 (1941)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
C
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.

California Supreme Court
110 P.2d 983 (1941)

Facts

The City of Pasadena (City) (plaintiff) had easements across various parcels of land. Each easement was granted “for the purpose of installing and maintaining water mains” and was “five feet in width.” There was no language in any deed to suggest that any easement was exclusive. California-Michigan Land & Water Co. (California-Michigan) (defendant) received easements from the servient landowners to place its own water mains within the City’s easements, and did so. The City then filed suit for an injunction requiring California-Michigan to remove its water mains. The City claimed that the presence of the additional water mains substantially interfered with its existing water mains and would prevent the City from using the full five feet if it should decide to install more water mains in the future. The trial court found that California-Michigan’s water mains did not unreasonably interfere with the City’s use of the easements and denied the request for an injunction. The City appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gibson, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 782,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Property

Key Terms