City of San Jose v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball

776 F.3d 686 (2015)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

City of San Jose v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
776 F.3d 686 (2015)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Major League Baseball (MLB) (defendant) required each of its 30 member clubs, or franchises, to play their home games within a designated territory. The Oakland Athletics team (the Athletics) was required to play in the counties of Alameda and Contra Costa. The Athletics wanted to move to the City of San Jose (plaintiff), but San Jose fell within the territory of the San Francisco Giants. A franchise was not allowed to relocate to another franchise’s territory without the approval of at least three-quarters of MLB’s clubs. The Athletics entered an option to purchase land in San Jose. The MLB began investigating the implications of a move, but the process dragged on. No approval was forthcoming, and San Jose believed that MLB was trying to maintain a local monopoly. San Jose sued MLB under various laws, including state and federal antitrust laws. The district court granted MLB’s motion to dismiss the antitrust claims based on the baseball industry’s historic exemption from antitrust laws. San Jose appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kozinski, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership