City of Tampa v. City National Bank of Florida
Florida District Court of Appeal
974 So. 2d 408 (2007)

- Written by Catherine Cotovsky, JD
Facts
The City of Tampa (Tampa) (plaintiff) sought relief from the circuit court’s order in favor of City National Bank of Florida and Citivest Construction Corporation (Citivest) (defendants), which reversed Tampa’s denial of a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to Citivest, who planned to build a high-rise condominium complex in a historic district. The property upon which Citivest planned to build the 24-story building was zoned to allow high-rise, multifamily structures, but it was located within a historic district among single-family homes and much smaller, shorter multi-family buildings. The property had been zoned for high-rises for many years before the area was designated as a historic district and had not been re-zoned after the historic-district designation had occurred. Tampa’s Architectural Review Commission (ARC) and city council denied the COA on the grounds that the proposed building was too tall and thus violated the historic-district guidelines. The matter was appealed to the circuit court, which ruled that by asserting ARC guidelines over the applicable zoning ordinance, Tampa had not abided by the essential requirements of the law. Tampa petitioned for second-tier certiorari of the circuit court’s order.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.