City of Tampa v. City National Bank of Florida

974 So. 2d 408 (2007)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

City of Tampa v. City National Bank of Florida

Florida District Court of Appeal
974 So. 2d 408 (2007)

Facts

The City of Tampa (Tampa) (plaintiff) sought relief from the circuit court’s order in favor of City National Bank of Florida and Citivest Construction Corporation (Citivest) (defendants), which reversed Tampa’s denial of a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to Citivest, who planned to build a high-rise condominium complex in a historic district. The property upon which Citivest planned to build the 24-story building was zoned to allow high-rise, multifamily structures, but it was located within a historic district among single-family homes and much smaller, shorter multi-family buildings. The property had been zoned for high-rises for many years before the area was designated as a historic district and had not been re-zoned after the historic-district designation had occurred. Tampa’s Architectural Review Commission (ARC) and city council denied the COA on the grounds that the proposed building was too tall and thus violated the historic-district guidelines. The matter was appealed to the circuit court, which ruled that by asserting ARC guidelines over the applicable zoning ordinance, Tampa had not abided by the essential requirements of the law. Tampa petitioned for second-tier certiorari of the circuit court’s order.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership