City of Tucson v. State

273 P.3d 624 (2012)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

City of Tucson v. State

Arizona Supreme Court
273 P.3d 624 (2012)

Facts

The Arizona Constitution included a home-rule provision. Under the provision, a city that adopted its own charter was granted autonomy over matters of local concern. In 1929, the city of Tucson (the city) (plaintiff) adopted its own charter and became a charter city. The city’s charter detailed the procedures for the election of city-council members. City-council members were nominated in ward-based primary elections; that is, they were nominated from particular districts within the city. But city-council members were elected in at-large, or city-wide, general elections. The city-council elections were partisan, which meant that candidates were identified by their party affiliation. In 2009, the Arizona legislature amended Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-821.01. As amended, § 9-821.01 barred a city from electing its city council in partisan elections. Section 9-821.01 also barred a city that used a ward-based primary election for council members from using an at-large general election. The city brought suit against the State of Arizona (the state) (defendant), contending that the amendments to § 9-821.01 did not apply to it as a charter city. The superior court granted summary judgment in favor of the state. The city appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bales, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership