City of Warren v. Walker

354 N.W.2d 312, 135 Mich. App. 267 (1984)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

City of Warren v. Walker

Michigan Court of Appeals
354 N.W.2d 312, 135 Mich. App. 267 (1984)

Facts

The City of Warren, Michigan (the city) enacted an ordinance that prohibited minors (i.e., people under the age of 17) from publicly associating with or being involved with video games and other mechanical amusements without the presence of a parent or guardian. The city passed the ordinance because city lawmakers noticed that children were spending lunch money on pinball machines in arcades close to school instead of buying lunch and then borrowing or stealing money from parents or other children. Additionally, city lawmakers had received complaints from parents, school officials, owners of neighboring stores, and city residents who complained about vandalism, truancy, noise, littering, traffic problems, and increased crime associated with amusement centers such as arcades. The lawmakers also believed that video and pinball games caused negative psychological effects, including gambling compulsions and addiction. Jacqueline Walker (defendant) owned Walker’s Pinball Arcade (the arcade) in the city. In January 1979, police officers discovered at least six people under 17 years of age in the arcade without parents or guardians. The officers cited Walker for violating the city’s ordinance. Walker was tried, convicted, and fined $500. The conviction and fine were affirmed on appeal. Walker then appealed to the Michigan Court of Appeals, challenging the validity of the city’s ordinance. Walker claimed that (1) the ordinance infringed on the First Amendment freedoms of expression and association, and (2) the ordinance violated state and federal constitutional guarantees of equal protection.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wahls, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership