Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Clair v. Hillenmeyer

232 S.W.3d 544 (2007)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

Clair v. Hillenmeyer

Kentucky Court of Appeals

232 S.W.3d 544 (2007)

Facts

Jeffrey K. Clair (defendant) noticed undesirable septic-system surface percolation on the property he had contracted to buy from Paul E. Hillenmeyer (plaintiff). Clair added a handwritten contract proviso requiring Hillenmeyer to "repair [the] system to meet code." Hillenmeyer, Clair, and a plumber discussed various ways to modify the system, but Clair rejected the one proposal that Hillenmeyer considered feasible and made no counterproposal of his own. Clair expressed his dissatisfaction and withdrew from the contract. Hillenmeyer eventually sold the property to another buyer, but for substantially less money than he would have realized from selling the property to Clair. Hillenmeyer sued Clair for breach of contract. At trial, Hillenmeyer testified that it was normal for water to percolate to the surface, that the system had always met code, and that Clair's proviso did not obligate Hillenmeyer to modify the system to Clair's satisfaction. On the other hand, Hillenmeyer admitted that neither he nor Clair really knew what "meeting code" meant; the plumber testified that surface percolation was a sign of the septic system's failure; and the contract's preprinted boilerplate contained a clause specifying that, given timely notice, the seller had to make reasonable repairs in a manner acceptable to the buyer. The trial judge court granted Hillenmeyer summary judgment and awarded him damages. Clair appealed to the Kentucky Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Nickell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership